<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Airline Post &#187; Airline News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.airlinepost.com/category/airline-news/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.airlinepost.com</link>
	<description>Airline industry news, aviation news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Four brand new 777-300ER for British Airways!</title>
		<link>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/four-brand-new-777-300er-for-british-airways.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/four-brand-new-777-300er-for-british-airways.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 21:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stewart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Airline News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boeing 777]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british airways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airlinepost.com/?p=1715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first UK carrier to operate Boeing 777-300ER is British Airways. UK&#8217;s national airline just has taken delivery of first of the six planes on order. The newly registered G-STBA will have a four class interior, 297 seats and it &#8230; <a href="http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/four-brand-new-777-300er-for-british-airways.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first UK carrier to operate Boeing 777-300ER is British Airways. UK&#8217;s national airline just has taken delivery of first of the six planes on order.<br />
<span id="more-1715"></span><br />
The newly registered G-STBA will have a four class interior, 297 seats and it is the first aircraft delivered to BA this year. By the end of the year, two more planes should be scheduled for flights under the British Airways livery.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.airlinepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/BA777.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1716 aligncenter" title="BA777" src="http://www.airlinepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/BA777.jpg" alt="" width="359" height="239" /></a></p>
<p>BA is taking three more Boeings 777 by early 2012, and the executives of the company are already proud to announce that the interior of the aircraft&#8217;s cabin has been completely modernised. The new in-flight entertainment system will also assure the customer satisfaction by providing 50% more choices on movies, television and music products, the representatives of BA say.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It is the aircraft first to be fitted-out with our new &#8216;World Traveller&#8217; and &#8216;World Traveller Plus&#8217; cabins&#8221;, Willie Walsh, CEO of British Airways, says.</p></blockquote>
<p>The 777 delivered to the UK carrier will also feature BA&#8217;s &#8216;First&#8217; and &#8216;Club World&#8217; interiors.</p>
<p>British Airways therefore becomes the third European carrier to operate 700-300ER, after Turkish Airlines and Air France-KLM. The twin-engine jet airliner is powered by a couple of General Electric 90-115B turbofans, currently the most powerful used engines in use. The range of this lovely aircraft is 7,930 nautical miles (14,690 km).</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s a &#8220;making of&#8221; video of the G-STBA:<br />
<center><br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="540" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mLGqrsjILo4&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="540" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mLGqrsjILo4&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/four-brand-new-777-300er-for-british-airways.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Seriously Weird Aircrafts</title>
		<link>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/5-seriously-weird-aircraft.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/5-seriously-weird-aircraft.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Airline News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airplanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prototype]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airlinepost.com/?p=1630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The history of aircraft design has taken some strange turns over the years, with some of these turns resulting in spectacular successes &#8212; others, in catastrophe. However, with failure sometimes comes success, just at a later date and with better &#8230; <a href="http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/5-seriously-weird-aircraft.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The history of aircraft design has taken some strange turns over the years, with some of these turns resulting in spectacular successes &#8212; others, in catastrophe. However, with failure sometimes comes success, just at a later date and with better technology. As you peruse the following aircraft, though some might at first seem comical in design, be sure to consider the time at which they were constructed and how extraordinarily innovative and creative the theories behind their designs must have seemed to their colleagues. In a few of these aircraft, you may even notice traits similar to modern day aircraft.<br />
<span id="more-1630"></span><br />
<strong>1. <a href="http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=10856">VZ-9AV Avrocar</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.airlinepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/1-vz-9av-avrocar.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1631" title="1-vz-9av-avrocar" src="http://www.airlinepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/1-vz-9av-avrocar.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="478" /></a></strong></p>
<p>Initially a Canadian project, when funding ran short, this oddity became a US military project during the 1950&#8242;s. Due to severe instability (the aircraft looked like a hubcap and unfortunately wobbled as one might as well) when flying higher than three feet above the ground, the project was cancelled in 1961.</p>
<p><strong>2. <a href="http://www.sprucegoose.org/aircraft_artifacts/exhibits.html">H-4 Hercules</a> (aka. The Spruce Goose)</strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.airlinepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/2-h-4-hercules.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1632" title="2-h-4-hercules" src="http://www.airlinepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/2-h-4-hercules.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="429" /></a><br />
</strong></p>
<p>Ah yes, you&#8217;ve probably heard of this one. Howard Hughes&#8217;s great plans for a massive transport plane to support the war effort during WWII resulted in the creation of the H-4 Hercules. With wings longer than a football field, this mammoth aircraft did manage to take flight with Hughes himself at the controls. But longevity was not in the Goose&#8217;s future, and the behemoth was promptly stashed away in a holding hanger to be kept in flight-ready status for years. After being passed along to several homes since then, she is still on display today at the Evergreen Aviation and Space Museum in McMinnville, Oregon.</p>
<p><strong>3. <a href="http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Martin-Marietta_X-24">Martin-Marietta X-24</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.airlinepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/3-martin-marietta-x-24.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1633" title="3-martin-marietta-x-24" src="http://www.airlinepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/3-martin-marietta-x-24.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="467" /></a><br />
</strong></p>
<p>So we go from mega-plane to mini-aircraft. This funky little wingless aircraft was developed as a joint effort between the US Air Force and NASA during the 60&#8242;s and 70&#8242;s to test unpowered reentry from space. The aircraft utilized vertical fins for control during its flight. While it might not look like much, this little sucker managed to reach 1036 miles per hour, and had a maximum altitude of 71,400 feet. Just goes to show you that size doesn&#8217;t always mean much when it comes to aircraft.</p>
<p><strong>4. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AV-8B_Harrier_II">AV- 8B Harrier II</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.airlinepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/4-harrier.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1634" title="4-harrier" src="http://www.airlinepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/4-harrier.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="429" /></a><br />
</strong></p>
<p>With its vertical take off and landing capabilities, the Harrier is probably the best-known and recognizable aircraft on this list. Maybe not so weird looking and interesting in concept or design, the Harrier combines the vertical abilities that its predecessors in the Tailsitter family once sought, with the technological advancements to make their dreams a reality.</p>
<p>A combined effort between Boeing, Rolls-Royce, and British Aerospace, the Harrier AV-8B&#8217;s first flight was in November of 1981. As the &#8216;Most forward deployed tactical strike aircraft in combat,&#8217; and with the capabilities to launch AGM-84 Harpoon anti-shipping missiles, AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles and AIM-7 Sparrow AAMs, this weird aircraft has the experience and firepower to back up it&#8217;s uncommon design.</p>
<p><strong>5. <a href="http://www.voughtaircraft.com/heritage/products/html/v-173.html">Vought V-173</a> (aka. Flying Pancake)</strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.airlinepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/5-vought.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1635" title="5-vought" src="http://www.airlinepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/5-vought.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="347" /></a><br />
</strong></p>
<p>Its nickname says it all. This propeller driven contraption with a wood and fabric frame, developed by Charles Zimmerman, was first flown on November 23, 1942. It never had much success though in the 131 hours of flight time it accumulated, and it now sits in the Smithsonian Institution&#8217;s Air Museum.</p>
<p>Elisa is a freelance travel writer for <a href="http://www.frequentflyercreditcards.com.au/">FrequentFlyerCreditCards.com.au</a> where you can get airline loyalty reviews, read Australian airport guides and <a href="http://www.frequentflyercreditcards.com.au/frequent-flyer-credit-cards/">compare credit cards for frequent flyers</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/5-seriously-weird-aircraft.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lufthansa vs. Emirates</title>
		<link>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/lufthansa-vs-emirates.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/lufthansa-vs-emirates.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stewart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Airline News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dubai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emirates airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lufhtansa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAE Emirates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airlinepost.com/?p=1668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The war between Lufthansa and Emirates continues with the newest accusations form Dubai&#8217;s airline. Emirates claim that Lufthansa is blocking their access in Germany by distributing a document that contains misleading facts about them, such as: false facts about Emirates &#8230; <a href="http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/lufthansa-vs-emirates.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The war between Lufthansa and Emirates continues with the newest accusations form Dubai&#8217;s airline. Emirates claim that Lufthansa is blocking their access in Germany by distributing a document that contains misleading facts about them, such as: false facts about Emirates business model, an inaccurate number of flights that Emirates makes to the country and the carrier&#8217;s rights to land in Germany.<br />
<span id="more-1668"></span><br />
At the moment, Emirates Airlines cannot fly from Dusseldorf, Hamburg, Frankfurt and Munich. For years in a row, Emirates is trying to get rights to land in Berlin and Stuttgart, but Lufthansa&#8217;s fear of a carrier that offers<a href="http://www.dealchecker.co.uk/cheap-flights/dubai.html" target="_blank"> cheap flights to Dubai</a> has been setting the rules when talking about the flights from Germany to the UAE.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.airlinepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/emirates-vs-lufthansa.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1669" title="emirates-vs-lufthansa" src="http://www.airlinepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/emirates-vs-lufthansa.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a>In April, Lufthansa accused Emirates of trying to divert the airline traffic from the European country to the UAE. Lufthansa also suggested that offering more landing rights to the Emirates Airlines would mean a loss of German jobs to Dubai. Emirates argue that a bigger presence in Germany would imply more economic benefits for the country. Emirates is already supporting the German economy, since its recent order of Airbus 380 contributes directly and indirectly to tens of thousands of German workers.</p>
<p>Emirates accused Lufthansa of distributing the above-mentioned document not just to policy makers, but to media as well. As a reply, Dubai&#8217;s airline made its own anti-protectionist report, suggestively named: &#8220;Tearing Down the Other Wall&#8221;.</p>
<p>Is it already too much or the German restrictions imposed to an Arab airline might sound a bit too racist?</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.thenational.ae/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100630/BUSINESS/706309907/1005" target="_blank">The National</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/lufthansa-vs-emirates.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Starcraft II takes off with Korean Air</title>
		<link>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/starcraft-ii-takes-off-with-korean-air.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/starcraft-ii-takes-off-with-korean-air.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stewart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Airline News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blizzard Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[korean air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[livery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[StarCraft II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airlinepost.com/?p=1643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blizzard Entertainment and Korean Air signed a historical pact for the gaming industry and aviation. The release of Starcraft II will now be promoted through two special liveries on a 747 and a 737NG. Between July and December, don&#8217;t act &#8230; <a href="http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/starcraft-ii-takes-off-with-korean-air.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blizzard Entertainment and Korean Air signed a historical pact for the gaming industry and aviation. The release of Starcraft II will now be promoted through two special liveries on a 747 and a 737NG.<br />
<span id="more-1643"></span><br />
Between July and December, don&#8217;t act surprised if you&#8217;ll see Jim Raynor, the main character of the famous game, on a Korean Air jet. These two special Boeing will be flying both domestic and international routes, therefore if you want to spot them, make sure you&#8217;ll keep an eye for the inbound flights from Korea!<br />
<a href="http://www.airlinepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/korean-air-starcraft.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1652" title="korean-air-starcraft" src="http://www.airlinepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/korean-air-starcraft.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="342" /></a></p>
<p>Moreover, on the ground, four limousine buses of the same Korean Air will be skinned with different Starcraft II symbols, for the same period. Considering the fact that the planes will spend more time in the air than on the ground, this sounds like a better investment, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
<blockquote><p>“We’re pleased to be partnering with Korean Air, Korea’s leading airline, on this campaign. As we approach the global launch of StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty, this promotion represents a unique, large-scale opportunity to introduce the characters and style of the StarCraft universe to gamers throughout the world.”, says Paul Sams, COO at Blizzard Entertainment.</p></blockquote>
<p>Here&#8217;s a making-of video for the newest livery in Korean Air&#8217;s fleet:<br />
<center><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="540" height="345" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mEihbIVBTik&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="540" height="345" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mEihbIVBTik&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/starcraft-ii-takes-off-with-korean-air.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ryanair under investigation faces a €4.5M fine</title>
		<link>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/ryanair-under-investigation-faces-a-e4-5m-fine.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/ryanair-under-investigation-faces-a-e4-5m-fine.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 07:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Airline News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[easyjet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[French labour law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ryanair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airlinepost.com/?p=1615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The French newpaper Le Figaro has revealed that Ryanair has been under investigation for several months now in regards to illegal worker contracts in France. Like EasyJet recently, Ryanair is “accused of failing to declare workers”, about 120 employees. However, Ryanair could have to pay much more compensation than the orange airline. <a href="http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/ryanair-under-investigation-faces-a-e4-5m-fine.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The French newspaper <a href="http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2010/05/02/01016-20100502ARTFIG00150-soupcons-de-travail-clandestin-chez-ryanair-.php">Le Figaro</a> has revealed that Ryanair has been under investigation for several months now in regards to illegal worker contracts in France. Like EasyJet recently, Ryanair is “accused of failing to declare workers”, about 120 employees. However, Ryanair could have to pay much more compensation than the orange airline.</p>
<p>Indeed,while EasyJet finally ended up paying 1, 5M Euros, Ryanair&#8217;s penalties could reach  €4,5M. Throughout the process, in order to lower its costs and fees, Ryanair has been using the same strategy as easyJet, which is to take advantage of the lower protection and charges of British Law/Irish law.<a href="http://www.airlinepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/mp2premiervol.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1617 alignright" src="http://www.airlinepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/mp2premiervol-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a>It seems Ryanair&#8217;s streak of bad luck is not over. Ryanair is also under investigation regarding public subsidies, <a href="http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/weekend/2010/0501/1224269451828.html">an Irish Times article reported just last week end</a>. Gerry Byrne points tells the truth about the Ryanair business model, exposing just how Ryanair gets such important financial support from publics authorities.</p>
<p>In France, Air France has already filed a complaint against Ryanair, and it is now Lufthansa&#8217;s turn to express its discontent over the Lubeck public authorities having signed a new two-year agreement with the Irish airline. The amount of subsidies however has not been published. Ryanair is currently under investigation in relation to 7 airports over what Lufthansa calls “questionable subsidies”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/ryanair-under-investigation-faces-a-e4-5m-fine.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slammed by the French Labour Court, EasyJet will have to pay €1.5M</title>
		<link>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/slammed-by-the-french-labour-court-easyjet-will-have-to-pay-e1-5m.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/slammed-by-the-french-labour-court-easyjet-will-have-to-pay-e1-5m.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Airline News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airline fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[easyjet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labour french court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ryanair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airlinepost.com/?p=1595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a 3-year investigation years over the legal status of hundreds workers (170) based at Orly Airport, EasyJet was ordered to pay up to €1.5m to the French labour healthcare public body. The orange airline was more precisely “accused of failing to &#8230; <a href="http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/slammed-by-the-french-labour-court-easyjet-will-have-to-pay-e1-5m.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a 3-year investigation years over the legal status of hundreds workers (170) based at Orly Airport, EasyJet <a href="http://connexionfrance.com/easyjet-fined-employing-french-staff-%20uk-work-contracts-court-ruling-budget-airline-11567-view-article.html">was ordered to pay up to €1.5m to the French labour healthcare public body</a>. The orange airline was more precisely “<em>accused of failing to declare workers in Orly between June 2003 and December 2006”. </em></p>
<p><em><span id="more-1595"></span><br />
</em></p>
<div>
<p><strong><em>An important fine, and a crucial judgment. <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/rich_w/17232861/"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1599" title="easyjet-tail" src="http://www.airlinepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/easyjet-tail-225x300.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="300" /></a></em></strong></p>
</div>
<p>Indeed, the French Labour Court may have set a precedent in the low-cost airline market. When I first reported the news, last year, fine estimations were between £200,000 and €10M. One can now ask what will happen to other airline who fail to accurately declare their workforce? Indeed, EasyJet is not the only company with French labour law violations, Ryanair is also facing important charges. The Irish budget airline is using the same principle than easyJet, taking advantage of the lower protection and charges of British Law/Irish law. Its business model does not include employment contract protection or a union. <a href="http://airobserver.wordpress.com/2010/03/29/french-mp-wants-an-investigation-over-ryanair%E2%80%99s-subsidies/">A French MP recently denunciated Ryanair model because of its “low cost” employer policy.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/slammed-by-the-french-labour-court-easyjet-will-have-to-pay-e1-5m.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Got some change? I have to use the toilet!</title>
		<link>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/got-some-change-i-have-to-use-the-toilet.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/got-some-change-i-have-to-use-the-toilet.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 06:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stewart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Airline News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airline taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airline toilets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ryanair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ryanair fees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airlinepost.com/?p=1588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prepare to hear this if you&#8217;re flying anytime soon with&#8230; Ryanair, of course. The Irish carrier seems to be in a competition with itself for introducing the most absurd taxes aviation could ever experience. And when we think they finally &#8230; <a href="http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/got-some-change-i-have-to-use-the-toilet.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prepare to hear this if you&#8217;re flying anytime soon with&#8230; Ryanair, of course. The Irish carrier seems to be in a competition with itself for introducing the most absurd taxes aviation could ever experience. And when we think they finally won, Ryanair announces a new tax.</p>
<p><span id="more-1588"></span><br />
Using the toilet on a Ryanair flight will cost you £1 or 1 Euro and you cannot protest before having to pay, since the toilets will be coin operated. Moreover, expect to stay in line before using the toilet, since the officials of Ryanair are also planning to cut to number of on board toilets to just&#8230; one. The new rate will be introduced in the fall.</p>
<p><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3258/3232582782_5af9dde1a7_o.jpg"><img class="alignright" title="Ryanair introduces toilet tax" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3258/3232582782_5af9dde1a7_o.jpg" alt="" width="410" height="279" /></a></p>
<p>Moreover, the company intends to raise the charge for checked in luggages from £15 to £20, during summer. &#8220;We are determined to incentivise passengers to travel light this summer by increasing our checked-in baggage fees for the months of July and August only&#8221;, spokesman Stephen McNamara says.</p>
<p>This is clearly a &#8220;family tax&#8221;, since they are the ones that need luggages. Just imagine going on vacation with a couple of young kids and just a handbag of spare clothes. Does not sound like such a good idea, does it? Therefore, if flying on a Ryanair plane this summer, with a noisy family in the cabin, make sure to ask them if they have a checked-in bag before complaining about the situation. Why? Because they might be the ones whom you owe those low ticket fares you took advantage of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/got-some-change-i-have-to-use-the-toilet.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ryanair about to launch its first social media campaign</title>
		<link>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/ryanair-about-to-launch-its-first-social-media-campaign.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/ryanair-about-to-launch-its-first-social-media-campaign.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Airline News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ryanair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airlinepost.com/?p=1583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ryanair has announced to launch its first online community of loyal customers to step into the world of social world. As said by spokesman Stephen McNamara, the company has not gone into social media earlier because of the volume of &#8230; <a href="http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/ryanair-about-to-launch-its-first-social-media-campaign.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryanair has announced to launch its first online community of loyal customers to step into the world of social world. As said by spokesman Stephen McNamara, the company has not gone into social media earlier because of the volume of customers it was dealing with which in turn would result into a fruitless social media experience.</p>
<p><span id="more-1583"></span></p>
<p>As he explained, the company does not have employees sitting around to answer silly questions which people ask around social networks like whether it is ok to carry a bag weighing 10 kg during their travel. According to him answers to these sorts of questions can be easily found on the company website.<a href="http://www.airlinepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/social-media-airline.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1585" title="social-media-airline" src="http://www.airlinepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/social-media-airline.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="214" /></a></p>
<p><b>Ryanair Long-haul flights have \&#8221;blowjobs\&#8221; included! </b></p>
<p>In the recent world of social media there lie a lot of issues and big companies are learning fast from their mistakes which they suffered when dealing with customers through solial media platforms like Twitter and Facebook. It is mainly because of the wrong way in which the companies approach social media.</p>
<p>But there is a big difference with Ryanair. Everyone working in Ryanair knows exactly how to deal with this game and the company also knows how to handle the sarcastic but hilarious O’Leary and Co. one of Michael O’Leary’s Twitter streams contain non-stop insights of the continuous failings of his competitors along with the uselessness of the DAA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/ryanair-about-to-launch-its-first-social-media-campaign.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>British Airways under heavy strike</title>
		<link>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/british-airways-under-heavy-strike.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/british-airways-under-heavy-strike.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Airline News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airline strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british airways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strike]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airlinepost.com/?p=1580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[British Airways started a 3 day strike to protest against the planned changes to pay and other conditionals that made thousands of passengers suffer. BA and the Unite Union had a fierce disagreement regarding this strike’s effect, but 12,000 cabin &#8230; <a href="http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/british-airways-under-heavy-strike.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>British Airways started a 3 day strike to protest against the planned changes to pay and other conditionals that made thousands of passengers suffer. BA and the Unite Union had a fierce disagreement regarding this strike’s effect, but 12,000 cabin crew of the airlines finally staged the final day of industrial action. The BA staff has made it clear that unless a reasonable solution is found to justify the employees’ pay they will go for strike again on March 27.</p>
<p><span id="more-1580"></span></p>
<p>According to British Airways, it succeeded to manage the workers’ walk out well on the last Saturday and Sunday. It successfully reinstated more than 26 flights that would have axed due to the prevailing strike.<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/10702860@N07/948837877/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1581" title="british-airways-boeing747" src="http://www.airlinepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/british-airways-boeing747.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="240" /></a></p>
<p>As said by the chief executive Willie Walsh in a video statement, BA will definitely keep its flights running same as before. According to him, many other have come forward to make sure the BA flights do run into any sort of problems due to the strike.</p>
<p>On the other hand, according to the Unite around 20 per cent of the crew walked out of the work on last Sunday. As informed by the Unite&#8217;s joint leader Tony Woodley, 5 cabin crew have broken ranks and 80 other worked have reported sick. He has also appealed the BA to come to a solution soon to stop the next strike which is supposed to be held on March 27, during busy Easter holiday period. He has already appealed to the BA chairman and other influencing people in the company. According to him, the company should consider passengers first and try to negotiate with the cabin crew.</p>
<p>According to BA, more than 97% of the cabin crew at Gatwick has returned to work and around 50% of the crew at Heathrow have turned up. But as reported by the Unite only 300 crew members out of 2200 have restored to work.</p>
<p>BA has promised to make 8 long-haul flights and 18 short-haul flights operate which were supposed to get cancelled due to the strike. BA is also using its non-striking staff to offer seats leased from other carriers like Ryanair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/british-airways-under-heavy-strike.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American Airlines has joined the fight against Tarmac rule</title>
		<link>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/american-airlines-has-joined-the-fight-against-tarmac-rule.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/american-airlines-has-joined-the-fight-against-tarmac-rule.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Airline News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boeing 737]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tarmac rule]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airlinepost.com/?p=1576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York- American Airlines have joined the group of carriers who are protesting government’s new strategy according to which passengers cannot be held on the tarmac for an unlimited time. It has also filed a complaint to the Department of &#8230; <a href="http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/american-airlines-has-joined-the-fight-against-tarmac-rule.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York- American Airlines have joined the group of carriers who are protesting government’s new strategy according to which passengers cannot be held on the tarmac for an unlimited time. It has also filed a complaint to the Department of Transportation which states that it will cost the company millions in fine due to the delays caused by the closure of JFK main runway. Along with American Airlines, JetBlue and Delta have also filed for exemptions.</p>
<p><span id="more-1576"></span></p>
<p>Government’s this rule will be in effect from the next month of April. This rule may create a fine worth of $4 million for an average Boeing 737. If a plane is on hold on the tarmac for more than 3 hours, then the fine amount per passengers will be $27,500. For international flight operators, the amount of fine will be much higher. For an example, Boeing 777 can run into a fine of $8.9 million just due to a single delayed flight.<a href="http://www.airlinepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/american-airlines-b757.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1578" title="american-airlines-b757" src="http://www.airlinepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/american-airlines-b757.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="196" /></a></p>
<p>American Airlines also informed that due to the ongoing construction at JFK, the company will be forced to cancel flights rather than being charged with these huge fines. It will mainly create problems for passengers in flights which available in limited number daily. The Federal Aviation Administration stated that JFK will suffer an average delay of 50 minutes during peak times and 29 minutes during normal hours during this runway construction. And this will last till 30<sup>th</sup> June.</p>
<p>American Airlines also supported JetBlue and Delta only with one condition that they will request to all other carriers operating at JFK. As said by the company spokesperson, if the rule does not apply to all the carriers equally then it is definitely going to create confusion among consumers. On the other hand, Kate Hanni of flyersrights.org, a passenger rights advocate, has asked DOT to deny the request.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.airlinepost.com/airline-news/american-airlines-has-joined-the-fight-against-tarmac-rule.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

